To: Board of Supervisors
From: Transportation
Meeting Date: July 10, 2018
|
Department Contact: |
Howard N. Dashiell |
Phone: |
463-4363 |
|
Item Type: Consent Agenda |
|
Time Allocated for Item: N/A |
Agenda Title:
title
Adoption of Resolution Approving Department of Transportation Agreement Number 180028, Professional Services Agreement with MGE Engineering, Inc., in the Amount of $220,376 for Construction Management Services for the Term Starting Upon Execution of the Agreement Through December 31, 2019, and Authorizing an Additional Contingency Amount of $22,000 for the Davis Creek Bridge Replacement on East Hill Road, County Road 301 (Willits Area)
End
Recommended Action/Motion:
recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving Department of Transportation Agreement number 180028, Professional Services Agreement with MGE Engineering, Inc. (MGE), in the amount of $220,376 for construction management services for the term starting upon execution of the Agreement through December 31, 2019, and authorizing an additional contingency amount of $22,000 for the Davis Creek Bridge replacement on East Hill Road, County Road 301, (Willits area); and authorize Chair to sign same.
End
Previous Board/Board Committee Actions:
By Resolution No. 12-002 (January 10, 2012), the Board of Supervisors (BOS) approved BOS Agreement No. 12-005/DOT Agreement No. 110102 with Drake Haglan & Associates for plans, specifications, and estimate bid package for the Davis Creek Bridge on East Hill Road. By Resolution No. 13-099 (October 8, 2013), Board authorized DOT Director to approve and execute amendments up to $55,000 to DOT Agreement No. 110102. By Resolution No. 13-124 (December 10, 2013), Board approved execution of a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Willits concerning the waterline relocation work for the Davis Creek Bridge Replacement project. By Resolution No. 14-151 (December 2, 2014), the Board approved Amendment No. 5 for a supplemental Extended Phase 1 Study for a previously unrecorded archaeological resource discovered at the site. By Resolution No. 17-186 (December 5, 2017), the Board authorized the Director of Transportation to advertise for bids and award DOT Contract No. 170079 for construction of the Davis Creek Bridge Replacement project.
Summary of Request:
There is a need for construction management services for the construction phase of the project. DOT has insufficient engineering staff to perform the work in a timely manner and therefore requires professional, expert, and technical services of a temporary nature. DOT has undergone a qualification based selection process to find a consultant who can perform the construction engineering work and has selected MGE based on their qualifications. DOT Agreement No. 180028 provides for specialized consultant services with MGE for construction management of the Davis Creek Bridge Replacement Project in the amount of $220,376. Costs of the project are to be funded primarily through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Bridge Program (HBP), with the local match covered by the Toll Credit Program. DOT also believes it is prudent to request a contingency in the amount of $22,000 in order to facilitate timely completion of the work.
Alternative Action/Motion:
Postpone award of DOT Agreement No. 180028.
Supplemental Information Available Online at: N/A
Fiscal Impact:
|
Source of Funding: FHWA HBP, Budget Unit 3041 |
Budgeted in Current F/Y: Yes |
|
|
Current F/Y Cost: : $220,376 ($22,000 contingency if needed) |
Annual Recurring Cost: N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supervisorial District: District 3 |
Vote Requirement: Majority |
|
Agreement/Resolution/Ordinance Approved by County Counsel: Yes
|
CEO Liaison: Steve Dunnicliff, Deputy CEO |
|
|
|
CEO Review: Yes |
|
|
CEO Comments:

FOR COB USE ONLY
|
Executed By: Meribeth Dermond |
Final Status:Adopted |
|
Date: July 10, 2018 |
Executed Item Number: Resolution Item Number: 18-099 |
|
|
Executed Item Number: Agreement Item Number:18-111 |
|
Note to Department Number of Original Agreements Returned to Dept: Two Original Agreement Delivered to Auditor? Yes |
|
|
|
|