To: Board of Supervisors
From: Planning and Building Services
Meeting Date: October 3, 2017
|
Department Contact: |
Julia Acker |
Phone: |
234-6650 |
|
Department Contact: |
Nash Gonzalez |
Phone: |
234-6650 |
|
Item Type: Consent Agenda |
|
Time Allocated for Item: N/A |
Agenda Title:
title
Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Processing of a Consolidated Coastal Development Permit by the California Coastal Commission for the Nature Conservancy to Increase Winter Survival and Rearing Capacity for Coho Salmon in the South Fork of the Ten Mile River
End
Recommended Action/Motion:
recommendation
Adopt Resolution authorizing the processing of a Consolidated Coastal Development Permit by the California Coastal Commission for the Nature Conservancy to increase winter survival and rearing capacity for Coho Salmon in the South Fork of the Ten Mile River; and authorize Chair to sign name.
End
Previous Board/Board Committee Actions:
None.
Summary of Request:
The Nature Conservancy proposes to increase winter survival and rearing capacity for Coho Salmon in the South Fork of the Ten Mile River by constructing a single off channel pond, a split flow side channel to maintain pond inlet accessibility, and two engineered log jams. Mapping from the California Coastal Commission has confirmed that the engineered log jams are under California Coastal Commission jurisdiction while the off channel pond and split flow channel are in Mendocino County jurisdiction. The Coastal Act was amended by Senate Bill 1843 effective January 1, 2007, which allows for a consolidated permitting process for projects for which the Coastal Development Permit authority is shared by a local government and the State Coastal Commission. Therefore, the Nature Conservancy is seeking a resolution which would consolidate the permit review under the Coastal Commission for this specific project only, and streamline the permit process. In support of this proposed consolidation request is that consolidation of the Coastal Development Permit would not substantially impair public participation in the review of the Coastal Development Permit, as a public hearing will still be held by the Coastal Commission and may be attended by interested parties or interested parties may submit written comments to the Coastal Commission.
Alternative Action/Motion:
Reject the Resolution and direct staff to process a Coastal Development Permit for that portion of the project located in the County’s jurisdiction.
Supplemental Information Available Online at: N/A
Fiscal Impact:
|
Source of Funding: N/A |
Budgeted in Current F/Y: N/A |
|
|
Current F/Y Cost: N/A |
Annual Recurring Cost: N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supervisorial District: District 4 |
Vote Requirement: Majority |
|
Agreement/Resolution/Ordinance Approved by County Counsel: Yes
|
CEO Liaison: Kenneth Spain, Administrative Analyst II |
|
|
|
CEO Review: Yes |
|
|
CEO Comments:
FOR COB USE ONLY
|
Executed By: Nadia Tipton |
Final Status:Adopted |
|
Date: October 4, 2017 |
Executed Item No.: Resolution Number: 17-140 |
|
Note to Department: |
|
|
Executed Documents Returned to Department: Originals _____ Copies _____ Hand Delivered ___ Interoffice Mail ___ Executed Agreement Sent to Auditor? Y/N |
|